New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 5/31/2002

State v. Richards

Citations

798 A.2d 136
351 N.J. Super. 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that evidence seized following an illegal protective search must be suppressed under the exclusionary rule
highlighting suspicion factors not present in that case and noting \what this record does not show is more persuasive than what it does reveal\
noting \[t]he neighborhood was not a high -crime area and guns were not a frequent concern in the area.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, Eichen and Collester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.