Skip to main content

State v. Richards

Citations

  • 438 S.E.2d 331
  • 190 W. Va. 299
  • 1993 W. Va. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that opening statements have no evidentiary value and do not justify 404 rebuttal evidence
  • stating that rebuttal evidence can only be introduced to rebut evidence previously introduced and that the mention of character issues during opening argument does not open the door to the introduction of otherwise inadmissible character evidence on rebuttal
  • evidence of character came “only after the State had introduced evidence of collateral crimes committed by the defendant ... and under these circumstances, the Court cannot conclude that they laid the foundation for the introduction of collateral crimes evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotherton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.