State v. Rice
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1068
Syllabus
Robbery sentence maximum R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 contrary to law considered financial sanctions fine ability to pay R.C. 2929.19(B)(5) costs. The maximum sentence imposed on a robbery count was not contrary to law. The prison term imposed was within the statutory range, and the record showed that the court considered the purposes of felony sentencing set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and the sentencing factors set forth in R.C. 2929.12. The trial court did not err in imposing a $1,000 total fine or in considering appellant's ability to pay.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. NitscheOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-26· cited 94×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-02· cited 57×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-12· cited 32×
- State v. JacobsOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-08-26· cited 30×
- State v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19· cited 17×
- State v. CruzOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-24· cited 9×
- State v. LevisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-07· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.