State v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \notwithstanding any law to the contrary\ clause in Section 72-1200(4) removes the court's discretion to grant deferred acceptance of guilty pleas under HRS § 853-1
• holding that, where the prostitution statute provides for specific sentencing “[n]otwithstanding any other law to the contrary,” the trial court lacks the power to grant a deferred acceptance of guilty plea in prostitution eases
• holding that, where the prostitution statute provides for specific sentencing “[n]otwithstanding any other law to the contrary,” the trial court lacks the power to grant a deferred acceptance of guilty plea in prostitution cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-08-30· cited 188×
• State v. Dannenberg
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1992-10-07· cited 44×
• State v. Smith
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-12-26· cited 29×
• State v. Mun Chung Tom
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1988-04-11· cited 22×
• State v. Klie
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 22×
• State v. Casugay-Badiang.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-06-19· cited 8×
• Jaylo v. Jaylo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-09-27· cited 7×
• Kienker v. Bauer
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-03-14· cited 1×
• State v. Casugay-Badiang
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-06-28