Skip to main content

State v. Rice

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2264

Syllabus

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the judgment finding the trial court properly admitted expert testimony on self-defense based on battered woman's syndrome, and the record did not demonstrate the trial court applied an incorrect standard, as argued by the prosecution. The verdict was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence, with no reversible error in evidentiary rulings apparent in the record.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.