Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/4/2015
State v. Rhoden
Citations
- 189 Wash. App. 193
- 356 P.3d 242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that post-Miranda statements may be admissible after a deliberate use of a two-step interrogation procedure if curative measures are present
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bjorgen, Johanson, Sutton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court· 1985-09-05· cited 721×
- United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsNinth Circuit· 2006-01-30· cited 222×
- State v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court· 1995-02-23· cited 107×
- State v. HeritageWashington Supreme Court· 2004-08-05· cited 98×
- State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-09-14· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.