Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/7/1998
State v. Reese
Citations
- 156 Or. App. 406
- 967 P.2d 514
- 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1676
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a GEI finding “is not an acquittal—it is a guilty verdict”—and not- ing that the “only difference between a ‘guilty’ verdict and a ‘guilty except for insanity’ verdict is the dispositional alter- natives” (emphasis omitted)
- concluding that a GEI finding “is not an acquittal—it is a guilty verdict”—and not- ing that the “only difference between a ‘guilty’ verdict and a ‘guilty except for insanity’ verdict is the dispositional alter- natives” (emphasis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Edmonds, Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Farrell v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2011-03-03· cited 29×
- State v. PineCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-24· cited 5×
- Richards v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-03· cited 1×
- State v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-17· cited 1×
- Lisa Gilpin v. Hon. harris/marcos MartinezArizona Supreme Court· 2024-08-07
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.