Court of Appeals of Kansas· 10/31/2014

State v. Reed

Citations

50 Kan. App. 2d 1133
336 P.3d 912
2014 Kan. App. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

defining the class as indecent solicitation of a child without refining any further where district court never determined specific facts related to the offense
stating defendant's failure to ensure adequate findings and conclusions on Freeman challenge foreclosed this court's review
defendant's failure to ensure the district court made adequate findings and conclusions on Freeman challenge foreclosed this court's review
lifetime postrelease supervision for indecent solicitation with a child \serves the valid penological objectives of deterring such conduct and in incapacitating and rehabilitating the offender\
lifetime postrelease supervision for indecent liberties with a child \serves the valid penological objectives of deterring such conduct and in incapacitating and rehabilitating the offender\
\[T]he district court does not have discretion to ignore the lifetime postrelease supervision requirement of K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 22-3717[d][1][G].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruns, Pierron, Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.