Missouri Court of Appeals· 10/25/2016
State v. Reed
Citations
- 502 S.W.3d 79
- 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1088
- 2016 WL 6236632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- 6 hours in interview room with active interrogation for 2 hours was “in and of itself, insufficient to overcome [defendant’s] free will”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dowd, Gaertner, Odenwald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-01-27· cited 239×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-03-09· cited 75×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-06-25· cited 69×
- State v. FaruqiSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-08-02· cited 42×
- Ringo v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-11-04· cited 29×
- State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Rickey BatesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-06-16· cited 14×
- State of Missouri v. Daaron HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-09-22· cited 13×
- State v. HaldimanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-05-06· cited 12×
- State v. ByrdMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-12-18· cited 11×
- State v. HofmannMissouri Court of Appeals· 1995-01-24· cited 9×
- State v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-09-02· cited 4×
- State v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-03-23· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.