Skip to main content

State v. Reed

Citations

  • 703 P.2d 756
  • 237 Kan. 685
  • 1985 Kan. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding mandatory consecutive sentences were required under the predecessor statute to K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-6606[d]—K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-4608[4]— because Reed committed two felonies after being released on felony bond pending trial in the first case
  • finding mandatory consecutive sentences were required under the predecessor statute to K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21-6606[d]—K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-4608[4]— because Reed committed two felonies after being released on felony bond pending trial in the first case
  • examining the predecessor statute, K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 21-4608[3], [4], and [5]
  • K.S.A. 21-4608 enacted to require mandatory consecutive sentences in certain cases to deal with the concern of the public over felonies committed by persons who had previous felony charges
  • “A trial court has no authority to direct a sentence to run consecutively to a nonexisting sentence which might thereafter be imposed in a pending case.” Id. at 690, 703 P.2d at 760 (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.