State v. Blevins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is impermissible for a sentencing court to require that a sentence, otherwise properly imposed, shall be served consecutively to a possible future sentence on pending criminal charges not disposed of at the time of the sentencing.” Id. at 865, 394 N.W.2d at 664 (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lucero
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1989-04-10· cited 18×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-08-23· cited 7×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. White
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 82×
• State v. Reed
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1985-07-26· cited 26×
• State v. Davis
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1978-04-05· cited 11×
• People v. Flower
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1982-03-22· cited 10×
• State v. Tweedy
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1976-05-26· cited 9×
• State v. Mastrilli
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-06· cited 7×
• People v. Lister
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-05-01· cited 5×
• State v. Sabala
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-12-28· cited 5×