Skip to main content

State v. Record

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 189

Syllabus

R.C. 2929.11, R.C. 2929.12, R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), consecutive sentences. The trial court did not err when it sentenced the appellant to consecutive sentences because the sentence was not contrary to law, and the trial court made the necessary statutory findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12. The trial court fully complied with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and the appellant's consecutive sentences were not improperly imposed.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.