Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/24/1986
State v. Ratliff
Citations
- 730 P.2d 716
- 46 Wash. App. 325
- 1986 Wash. App. LEXIS 3603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[a] permissive inference suggests to the jury a possible conclusion to be drawn\ if the \predicate facts\ are proven \but does not require\ that conclusion
- “[a] permissive inference suggests to the jury a possible conclusion to be drawn” if the “predicate facts” are proved “but does not require” that conclusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman, Ringold, Swanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 563×
- State v. CreekmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-16· cited 69×
- State v. BillupsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-07-29· cited 32×
- State v. SaltzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-15· cited 26×
- State v. NewcombCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-02-17· cited 23×
- State v. OliveCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-12· cited 22×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-08-07· cited 20×
- State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-26· cited 16×
- State v. HughesIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-08-12· cited 13×
- State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-12-27· cited 13×
- State v. FreitagCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-09· cited 12×
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-09-14· cited 10×
- Willett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1992-04-03· cited 9×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-06· cited 9×
- State v. O'HARACourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-11-29· cited 8×
- State v. HefaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-04-25· cited 5×
- State v. RawlsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-12-23· cited 2×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,990×
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 272×
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court· 1985-12-12· cited 220×
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 155×
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 111×
- McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court· 1966-04-21· cited 68×
- Hayes v. YountWashington Supreme Court· 1976-07-15· cited 66×
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-04· cited 47×
- State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-29· cited 42×
- King Logging Co. v. ScalzoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-02-16· cited 15×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-01-12· cited 12×
- Western Washington Cement Masons Health & Security Trust Funds v. Hillis Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-05-27· cited 9×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-06-27· cited 7×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-29· cited 5×
- City of Bellevue v. KinsmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.