Skip to main content

State v. Rash

Citations

  • 697 S.E.2d 71
  • 226 W. Va. 35
  • 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Having reviewed the record before us, we conclude that it was appropriate to admit E.L.’s testimony as 404(b
  • “Although assignment of error seven, the plain error rule, was likewise not raised in the Petition for Appeal, this Court has held that we may, in the interest of justice, consider this issue sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ketchum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.