West Virginia Supreme Court· 5/31/1955

State v. Huffman

Citations

87 S.E.2d 541
141 W. Va. 55
1955 W. Va. LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

purpose of the requirement \is to identify and authenticate the indictment and to prevent the substitution or the use of\ a non-authentic indictment
purpose of the requirement “is to identify and authenticate the indictment and to prevent the substitution or the use of’ a non-authentic indictment
\In a criminal case a verdict of guilty which is without sufficient evidence to support it will be set aside by the appellate court\
“In a criminal case a verdict of guilty which is without sufficient evidence to support it will be set aside by the appellate court’’
overruled on other grounds by State ex rel. R.L. v. Bedell, 192 W.Va. 435, 452 S.E.2d 893 (1994)
“The action of a trial court in admitting or excluding evidence in the exercise of its discretion will not be disturbed by the appellate court unless it appears that such action amounts to an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haymond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.