Supreme Court of New Jersey· 6/18/2012

State v. Randolph

Citations

44 A.3d 1113
210 N.J. 330
2012 WL 2225477
2012 N.J. LEXIS 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding the trial court is required to consider evidence of defendant’s rehabilitative efforts between initial sentencing and resentencing
stating that a A-1555-20 9 resentencing judge \should view [the] defendant as he stands before the court on that day\
suggesting that a remand for resentencing under Natale requires an amended judgment of conviction even where the court re-imposes the same sentence
observing that sentencing judge must evaluate relevant factors and “ ‘explain[ ] that evaluation on the record in sufficient detail to permit appellate review' ” (internal citation omitted)
observing that sentencing judge must evaluate relevant factors and “ ‘explain[ ] that evaluation on the record in sufficient detail to permit appellate review’ ” (internal citation omitted)
finding that a sentencing court should be cautious when imposing \multiple consecutive maximum sentences unless circumstances justifying such an extraordinary overall sentence are fully explicated on the record\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavecchia, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.