State v. William A. Case, Jr. (072688)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling appellate review must affirm a sentence supported by credible evidence in the record
• refusing to second-guess the sentencing court, \provided that the sentence does not 'shock the judicial conscience\ (quoting A-4644-17T1 53 Roth, 95 N.J. at 365)
• remanding for resentencing because the trial court relied on \unfounded assumptions rather than evidence in the record\ in finding a \critical\ aggravating factor
• requiring judges to consider any relevant aggravating and mitigating factors called to their attention and to explain how they arrived at a particular sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).