Skip to main content

State v. Ramos

Citations

  • 553 A.2d 1059
  • 1989 R.I. LEXIS 8
  • 1989 WL 6830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because there was no evidence of deliberate nondisclosure by the defendant, prejudice to the state would not be presumed
  • noting, where defendant sought only a physical examination, that a number of courts have held that a trial court has discretionary power to order a witness in a criminal trial to submit to a psychiatric examination
  • noting, where defendant sought only a physical examination, that a number of courts have held that a trial court has discretionary power to order a witness in a criminal trial to submit to a psychiatric examination
  • noting, where defendant sought only a physical examination, that a number of courts have held that a trial court has discretionary power to order a witness in a criminal trial to submit to a psychiatric examination
  • gynecological examinations of minors are \both intrusive and embarrassing\
  • gynecological examinations of minors are “both intrusive and embarrassing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.