State v. Ramos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting Green to its facts and refusing to extend the holding therein to cases of theft by taking
• stating it is not necessary to prove “the specific place” to obtain a theft-by-taking conviction, but it is necessary to prove the “specific location” to obtain a burglary conviction
• stating it is not necessary to prove “the specific place” to obtain a theft-by-taking conviction, but it is necessary to prove the “specific location” to obtain a burglary conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chancey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-11-13· cited 154×
• United States v. Nathan E. Gundy
  Eleventh Circuit· 2016-11-23· cited 59×
• Askea v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-03-12· cited 31×
• Morris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-03-17· cited 25×
• Mobley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-10-08· cited 17×
• Hindman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-10-16· cited 10×
• Charles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-09-08· cited 5×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-09-22· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lyle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1974-01-07· cited 19×
• Norman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1970-04-30· cited 14×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-09-02· cited 14×