Askea v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “interrogating officer’s remark that ‘it (i.e., telling the truth) would probably help him in court’ holds out at least some hope for reward by special consideration if the suspect cooperates”
• “A comment by an interrogating officer that it is always better to tell the truth is not such an inducement as to invalidate a confession.”
• “Acomment by an interrogating officer that it is always better to tell the truth is not such an inducement as to invalidate a confession.”
• “the interrogating officer’s remark that ‘it (i.e., telling the truth) would probably help [the defendant] in court’ holds out at least some hope for reward by special consideration if the suspect cooperates”
• “[T]he interrogating officer’s remark that ‘it (i.e., telling the truth) would probably help him in court’ [held] out at least some hope for reward by special consideration if the suspect cooperate[d]” and rendered the confession inadmissible.
• “the interrogating officer’s remark that ‘it (i. e., telling the truth) would probably help [the defendant] in court’ holds out at least some hope for reward by special 7 consideration if the suspect cooperates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).