Skip to main content

State v. Ramos

Citations

  • 632 So. 2d 1078
  • 1994 WL 51829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant proved inducement by a preponderance of evidence where an informant contacted him over a dozen times in order to convince him to get involved
  • finding inducement where the CI contacted the defendant fifteen or sixteen times to convince him to get involved in the drug transaction
  • testimony at pretrial hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss established government inducement and his lack of predisposition; not necessary to submit entrapment issue to jury.
  • although section 777.201(2) provides that issue of entrapment shall be submitted to trier of fact, determination of whether defendant was entrapped may be determined as a matter of law when factual issues not in dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baskin, Gersten and Goderich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.