District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/22/1994
State v. Ramos
Citations
- 632 So. 2d 1078
- 1994 WL 51829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant proved inducement by a preponderance of evidence where an informant contacted him over a dozen times in order to convince him to get involved
- finding inducement where the CI contacted the defendant fifteen or sixteen times to convince him to get involved in the drug transaction
- testimony at pretrial hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss established government inducement and his lack of predisposition; not necessary to submit entrapment issue to jury.
- although section 777.201(2) provides that issue of entrapment shall be submitted to trier of fact, determination of whether defendant was entrapped may be determined as a matter of law when factual issues not in dispute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baskin, Gersten and Goderich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nadeau v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-20· cited 12×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-24· cited 11×
- Dial v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-14· cited 10×
- State v. BlancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-02· cited 10×
- Robichaud v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-19· cited 8×
- Gennette v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-13· cited 6×
- State v. DawsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-30· cited 5×
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEROD HARPERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-05· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cruz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-03-07· cited 140×
- Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 111×
- State v. RamosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-11· cited 5×
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-12-16· cited 2×
- Hoffiz v. Valdes-Fauli, Cobb & Petrey, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.