Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/15/2026

State v. Ramirez

Citations

2026 Ohio 2226

Syllabus

Trial court's imposition of consecutive felony sentences was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law because the court made the required sentencing findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4).

Judges: M. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. McKennelly
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-18· cited 22×
State v. Harner
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-26· cited 18×
State v. Shiveley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-14· cited 15×
State v. Richey
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-06· cited 14×
State v. Evans
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-06· cited 3×
State v. Janosky
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-01-20· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.