Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/31/2025

State v. Ramirez

Citations

2025 Ohio 4977

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., there is no constitutional right to have one's police interview recorded. Convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. State's remarks during closing argument did not appeal to jurors' emotions, State did not improperly vouch for FBI agent's credibility, and State's use of personal anecdote was not confusing or prejudicial.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Koonce
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-31

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Long
Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
State v. Slagle
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 576×
State v. Moritz
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-07-16· cited 244×
State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-10· cited 155×
State v. Bond
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-11-23· cited 65×
State v. Knuff
Ohio Supreme Court· 2024-03-14· cited 63×
State v. Mastel
Ohio Supreme Court· 1971-06-09· cited 62×
State v. Barnhart
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-30· cited 53×
State v. Abdullahi
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-06· cited 15×
State v. Ahreshien
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-09· cited 6×
State v. Belcher
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-18· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.