Skip to main content

State v. Ralph

Citations

  • 175 Wash. App. 814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding double jeopardy was violated, even though “the statutory elements of the two crimes differ[ed],” because “as charged and proved” the crimes were “functional equivalent[s]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bjorgen, Hunt, Johanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.