Washington Supreme Court· 10/4/1979
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 600 P.2d 1249
- 92 Wash. 2d 671
- 1979 Wash. LEXIS 1435
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Legislature clearly intended proof of assault and/or kidnapping as elements of first degree rape
- recognizing that its conclusion regarding merger of the offenses therein was “strengthened when it is observed that constitutional double jeopardy provisions forbid double punishment”
- holding that, when the proof of kidnapping and assault “was accepted by the jury, those crimes became merged in the completed crime of first-degree rape” (footnote omitted)
- kidnapping and assault merge with first degree rape where they were part of the perpetration of the rape and did not have an independent purpose or effect
- two women voluntarily went into the defendant's home but kidnapping charge merged with the rape charge
- “Conviction in itself, even without imposition of sentence, carries an unmistakable onus which has a punitive effect. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Hicks, Horowitz, Roberts, Rosellini, Utter, Williams, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
- State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-04· cited 373×
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 348×
- State v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 261×
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 258×
- State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 252×
- State v. BondsWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 163×
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court· 2007-06-14· cited 154×
- State v. KierWashington Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 141×
- State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-15· cited 100×
- State v. CollicottWashington Supreme Court· 1992-06-04· cited 87×
- State v. WhitneyWashington Supreme Court· 1987-07-23· cited 79×
- State v. BergWashington Supreme Court· 2014-11-13· cited 75×
- State v. Rattana Keo PhuongCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-22· cited 75×
- State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-24· cited 71×
- State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-19· cited 67×
- State v. LazcanoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-16· cited 63×
- State v. FrohsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-10-14· cited 61×
- State v. EppensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-08-05· cited 61×
- In re the Personal Restraint of FrancisWashington Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 61×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 510×
- People v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals· 1965-02-04· cited 219×
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court· 1978-12-28· cited 96×
- State v. BresolinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-05· cited 84×
- People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1971-06-24· cited 64×
- State v. TylerWashington Supreme Court· 1970-03-05· cited 60×
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1966-12-15· cited 53×
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court· 1969-01-23· cited 52×
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 1967-06-15· cited 50×
- State v. WaldenburgCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-08-16· cited 31×
- State v. MaloneyWashington Supreme Court· 1971-02-18· cited 19×
- State v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-04-26· cited 18×
- State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-07-19· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.