State v. Ralls
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2110
Syllabus
MURDER – R.C. 2901.05 – SELF-DEFENSE – BURDEN OF PROOF – EVIDENCE – IMPERFECT SELF-DEFENSE – LESSER-INCLUDED OFFENSES: The trial court did not violate R.C. 2901.05 where the record included no indicia that the trial court failed to shift the burden of persuasion to the state. Defendant's conviction for felony-murder did not run afoul of the manifest weight of the evidence where the trial court resolved credibility determinations in favor of the state. The trial court did not commit plain error by failing to consider the affirmative defense of imperfect self-defense because Ohio law does not recognize this doctrine. The trial court did not commit plain error by failing to consider the lesser included offenses of voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, and reckless homicide before convicting defendant of felony-murder because Ohio appellate courts presume that the trial court considered lesser included offenses and there is nothing in the record to rebut this presumption.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. MelchiorOhio Supreme Court· 1978-10-04· cited 290×
- State v. SippleOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-16· cited 36×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-05· cited 31×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-10· cited 22×
- State v. ParrishOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-07· cited 21×
- State v. GoffOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-07· cited 13×
- State v. NealOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-20· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.