State v. Rackley
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4656
Syllabus
Postconviction motions failure to file direct appeal res judicata disclosure of grand jury minutes abuse of discretion secret particularized need. Because appellant did not file a direct appeal, his arguments relating to the plea proceedings and ineffective assistance of counsel are barred by res judicata. Further, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for grand jury minutes when he did not present a particularized need for disclosure.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 1988-08-31· cited 695×
- State v. ColeyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-10-03· cited 281×
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 274×
- State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-05-13· cited 218×
- State v. HiltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.