Skip to main content

State v. R. H.

Citations

  • 237 Or. App. 245
  • 239 P.3d 505
  • 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The allegations in a petition are viewed as a whole, with each one potentially conditioned or amplified by the others.”
  • applying preservation of error requirements in a juvenile dependency proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosenblum, Schuman, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.