Skip to main content
· 3/28/2012

Department of Human Services v. S. P.

Citations

  • 275 P.3d 979
  • 249 Or. App. 76
  • 2012 WL 1025682
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mother could chal- lenge all of the jurisdictional findings on appeal, including those pertaining to the father, because the findings were interdependent
  • holding that the mother could chal- lenge all of the jurisdictional findings on appeal, including those pertaining to the father, because the findings were interdependent
  • holding, in similar circum- stances, that “[w]e need not consider whether the same result would obtain where the parents’ circumstances are not so intertwined”
  • holding, in similar circum- stances, that “[w]e need not consider whether the same result would obtain where the parents’ circumstances are not so intertwined”
  • discussing a number of cases in which we reversed a judg- ment of jurisdiction where there was insufficient evidence that the parent’s behavior created a reasonable likelihood of harm to the child at the time of the dependency hearing
  • discussing a number of cases in which we reversed a judg- ment of jurisdiction where there was insufficient evidence that the parent’s behavior created a reasonable likelihood of harm to the child at the time of the dependency hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.