Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/30/2004
State v. Quincy
Citations
- 95 P.3d 353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- shoplifting arrest record and list of stolen merchandise admissible because it was “created in the regular course of business” and in case matter ever went to court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 632×
- State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court· 1997-11-06· cited 336×
- Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court· 1953-05-08· cited 72×
- State v. QuincyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-14· cited 27×
- State v. Ben-NethCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-05-09· cited 20×
- State v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-01· cited 19×
- State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-09-09· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.