Washington Supreme Court· 5/8/1953
Cantrill v. American Mail Line, Ltd.
Citations
- 257 P.2d 179
- 42 Wash. 2d 590
- 1953 Wash. LEXIS 484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing admission of medical records under RCW 5.45.020 through persons who did not create the records
- discussing admission of medical records under RCW 5.45.020 through persons who did not create the records
- noting importance of exception in context of hospital records typically created by multiple “attendants, nurses, physicians, X ray technicians, laboratory and other hospital employees”
- medical records properly admitted through treating physician who routinely relied on records prepared by her fellow physicians in the ordinary course of business in treating her patients
- exception created “for the purpose (among others) of making evidence that would otherwise be hearsay competent evidence” because record bears sufficient indicia of reliability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marisa Bavand v. Onewest Bank FsbCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-11-28· cited 88×
- State v. KreckWashington Supreme Court· 1975-11-20· cited 72×
- State v. ZieglerWashington Supreme Court· 1990-04-12· cited 72×
- Dabroe v. Rhodes Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1964-05-14· cited 46×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-07· cited 41×
- Young v. LiddingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1957-04-04· cited 38×
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-10· cited 35×
- Van Zandt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1966-03-02· cited 33×
- Ulve v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court· 1957-11-07· cited 32×
- Charles Kreck v. James SpaldingNinth Circuit· 1983-12-13· cited 28×
- State, Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Osborn v. AltmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-11-23· cited 27×
- State v. QuincyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-14· cited 27×
- Rose Wong and Kent Wong v. Walter Swier and Laura SwierNinth Circuit· 1959-04-10· cited 25×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1960-01-21· cited 25×
- Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-01-31· cited 24×
- State v. BarringerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-09-07· cited 24×
- Cooper v. Pay-N-Save Drugs, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1962-04-26· cited 22×
- State v. MubitaIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-06-11· cited 20×
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-13· cited 20×
- DeYoung v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court· 1957-09-12· cited 19×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 727×
- Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court· 1950-01-09· cited 323×
- State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court· 1951-01-04· cited 108×
- Owens v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 38×
- Lynch v. Republic Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1952-04-24· cited 21×
- Morrison v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court· 1951-05-15· cited 17×
- Perrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal· 1946-02-11· cited 12×
- Ludwig v. United StatesW.D. Washington· 1946-08-13· cited 5×
- Roberts v. United Fisheries Vessels Co.Supreme Court· 1944-10-16· cited 4×
- Combs v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1947-04-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.