State v. Quesnel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The State did not submit any evidence that the police, after knocking and announcing, heard frantic movement or flushing toilets or other signals that the occupants were attempting to destroy or hide evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Harada
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-02-27· cited 44×
• State v. Diaz
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 21×
• State v. Richardson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-10-10· cited 13×
• State v. Naeole.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-06-22· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Okumura
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-04· cited 181×
• People v. Condon
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-12· cited 107×
• State v. Davenport
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1973-11-21· cited 50×
• State v. Dorson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-08-20· cited 46×
• State v. Clark
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-11-23· cited 43×
• State v. Dias
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 38×
• State v. Abordo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-06-19· cited 31×
• State v. Garcia
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1995-01-26· cited 24×
• Illinois v. Condon
  Supreme Court· 1993-02-22· cited 10×