State v. Quackenbush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• condition against associating with codefendant was violated when defendant married the codefendant after judgment was pronounced but before it was entered
• “[W]hen it is clear from the record that a condition of probation is to take effect immediately, the validity of the condition does not depend on entry of the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hoffmeister
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-11-24· cited 18×
• State v. Hamlin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-03· cited 7×
• State v. Denson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-10· cited 7×
• State v. Lebeck
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 5×
• State v. Zimmerman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-19· cited 4×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gilkey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 9×
• State v. Quackenbush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-06-03· cited 5×
• State v. Puckett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 2×