State v. Gilkey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding special condition of probation requiring the defendant to receive written permission from court or probation officer before contacting his wife
• affirming revocation of the defendant’s probation; holding that the probation condition that the defendant admittedly had violated was “reasonably related to the needs of effective probation”
• condition of probation that defendant not contact wife without probation officer or court's permission appropriate where defendant convicted of harassing wife

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dawson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-03-31· cited 51×
• Farris v. Hutchinson
  Montana Supreme Court· 1992-08-17· cited 32×
• Petersen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-12-20· cited 31×
• State v. Kline
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-07-15· cited 9×
• State v. Saxon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 7×
• State v. Quackenbush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-18· cited 6×
• State v. Maack
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-15· cited 6×
• State v. McSweeney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-06· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Martin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-06-20· cited 56×
• State v. Sprague
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-06-29· cited 13×