Nebraska Supreme Court· 6/5/2020

State v. Price

Citations

944 N.W.2d 279
306 Neb. 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding those decisions established the law of the case and refusing to reconsider them
rejecting appellant’s argument that he met Mrza’s specificity requirement because specific allegations of ineffective assistance were separately numbered and discussed in argument section of his brief
describing that testimony in more detail
officer’s reference to “book-in photos” was minor in context of entire trial and not unfairly prejudicial
ineffective assistance of counsel claim not considered when assigned error did not specify counsel’s deficient performance, even though argument section of brief discussed claims in detail
ineffective assistance of counsel claim not considered when assigned error did not specify counsel’s deficient performance, even though argument section of brief discussed claims in detail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.