Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 7/25/2000

State v. Price

Citations

46 S.W.3d 785
2000 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a co-defendant’s recorded statements were admissible because they were only offered to provide context for the defendant’s own statements
holding that the trial court erred by allowing two witnesses to testify while retaining the writings that were used to refresh their recollection, but concluding that the error was harmless
stating that “information contained in the parties’ briefs is not a part of the appellate record”
stating that the statements of a non-testifying codefendant were not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted; instead, they were offered “for the purpose of providing the context of the defendant’s statements”
appellate court applies the same standard in reviewing both the denial of a judgment of acquittal and the sufficiency of the convicting evidence
“If an out-of-court statement is not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, such as a statement offered for impeachment purposes, it is not hearsay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Wade, Witt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.