State v. Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n officer cannot create exigent circumstances by his own action or inaction. The inconvenience and delay in obtaining a warrant does not, alone, justify a warrantless seizure.” (Citation omitted.)
• trial court did not have jurisdiction to rule on pending suppression motion when the state had taken an interlocutory appeal of the court’s order granting a different motion to suppress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-04-26· cited 13×
• State v. Hite
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-02· cited 12×
• State v. Rodriguez-Ganegar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 11×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-05-23· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Fondren
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 36×
• Murray Well-Drilling v. Deisch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-08-14· cited 21×
• State v. Nicholson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-01-27· cited 19×