Skip to main content

State v. Price

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2218

Syllabus

Application to reopen appeal; App.R. 26(B); genuine issue of a colorable claim of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel; untimely supplement; good cause; App.R. 26(B)(1); App.R. 26(B)(2)(b). Application to reopen appeal pursuant to App.R. 26(B) denied. Applicant failed to demonstrate a genuine issue of a colorable claim of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel based on appellate counsel's failure to advance assignments of error related to the alleged improper admission or exclusion of evidence at trial, the trial court's failure to advise applicant on the record that he had the right not to testify, and alleged errors in the jury instructions. Court did not need to resolve issue of whether applicant could file untimely supplement to application because even if arguments raised in proposed supplement were considered, it would not find grounds to reopen appeal.

Judges: Groves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.