Court of Appeals of Arizona· 3/14/2000
State v. Preston
Citations
- 4 P.3d 1004
- 197 Ariz. 461
- 317 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statute requiring defendant to prove entrapment by clear and convincing evidence did not violate due process
- requiring defendant to prove entrapment defense by clear and convincing evidence does not violate Due Process Clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flórez, Pelander, Druke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CaseyArizona Supreme Court· 2003-06-25· cited 48×
- State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp GrayArizona Supreme Court· 2016-06-20· cited 11×
- State of Arizona v. Craig A. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-02-03· cited 9×
- State v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-12· cited 5×
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-08-14· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Alice C. JeffreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-08-18
- State v. AdamoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-10-12
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.