State v. Potts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, “in cases * * * which essentially involve a swearing contest between the victim and defendant,” admission of expert testimony vouching for the victim’s “truthfulness” constitutes plain error (citing State v. Davilia, 239 Or App 468, 244 P3d 855 (2010))
• where trial court in bench trial specifically did mention its consideration of disputed evidence, court considered evidentiary error to be harmful
• discussing in plain error context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Inman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 42×
• State v. Volynets-Vasylchenko
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-23· cited 11×
• State v. Feller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 7×
• State v. Klontz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-31· cited 7×
• State v. Pickett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-12· cited 6×
• State v. Bahmatov
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-29· cited 6×
• State v. Whitlow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-23· cited 4×
• State v. Codon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-01· cited 3×
• Paul James Hill, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-01-28