State v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The state has the burden to prove that circumstances existing at the time were sufficient to satisfy an exception to the warrant requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Mejia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-26· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Baker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-01· cited 69×
• State v. McDonald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-21· cited 10×
• State v. De Aubre
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-04-16· cited 5×