State v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restitution was improper in unauthorized use of vehicle case where the state did not show a causal relationship between the defendant’s criminal activities and the damages
• where state did not attempt to establish when dent in car occurred, nothing in record showed that dent resulted from defendant’s theft of car, and so it was improper to order restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Hal
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-31· cited 14×
• State v. Mothershed
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-07· cited 4×
• State v. Guerrero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-31· cited 3×
• State v. Bonnie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-28· cited 1×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-31

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dillon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 98×
• State v. Hazlitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-01-29· cited 9×
• State v. Lefthandbull
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 9×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Dickerson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-03· cited 7×
• State v. Sellers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-11-20· cited 6×