Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/11/1977
State v. Posey
Citations
- 238 S.E.2d 176
- 269 S.C. 500
- 1977 S.C. LEXIS 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prohibiting the State from telling the fact-finder to draw a negative inference when the defendant fails to present any evidence at trial
- where defendant did not present evidence, it was error for solicitor to comment on defendant’s failure to call his wife who was eyewitness to crime
- where defendant did not present evidence, it was error for solicitor to comment on defendant's failure to call his wife who was eyewitness to crime
- ‘An accused has the right to rely entirely upon [the] presumption of innocence and the weakness in the State’s case against him. He would clearly be deprived of that right if an adverse inference is permitted to be indulged against him because of its exercise.’
- “An accused has the right to rely entirely upon [the] presumption of innocence and the weakness in the State’s case against him. He would clearly be deprived of that right if an adverse inference is permitted to be indulged against him because of its exercise.”
- declaring such a statement \elementary\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Rhodes, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 88×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-31· cited 88×
- State v. PrimusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 56×
- State v. BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-10-31· cited 50×
- State v. PickensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-01-22· cited 46×
- Douglas v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-08-10· cited 23×
- State v. PrimusCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-10· cited 10×
- State v. BambergSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-12-14· cited 8×
- In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-06-26· cited 8×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.