Skip to main content

State v. Posey

Citations

  • 238 S.E.2d 176
  • 269 S.C. 500
  • 1977 S.C. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prohibiting the State from telling the fact-finder to draw a negative inference when the defendant fails to present any evidence at trial
  • where defendant did not present evidence, it was error for solicitor to comment on defendant’s failure to call his wife who was eyewitness to crime
  • where defendant did not present evidence, it was error for solicitor to comment on defendant's failure to call his wife who was eyewitness to crime
  • ‘An accused has the right to rely entirely upon [the] presumption of innocence and the weakness in the State’s case against him. He would clearly be deprived of that right if an adverse inference is permitted to be indulged against him because of its exercise.’
  • “An accused has the right to rely entirely upon [the] presumption of innocence and the weakness in the State’s case against him. He would clearly be deprived of that right if an adverse inference is permitted to be indulged against him because of its exercise.”
  • declaring such a statement \elementary\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Rhodes, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.