Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/13/1968
State v. Porter
Citations
- 162 S.E.2d 843
- 251 S.C. 393
- 1968 S.C. LEXIS 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- it is proper to permit a witness to testify as to a telephone conversation with a man whose voice he subsequently recognizes as that of the defendant
- the identity of the party with whom the witness talked need not be known at the time of the conversation, but is sufficient if knowledge enabling the witness to identify the other party is later obtained
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Moss, Bussey, Brailsford, Littlejohn, JJ-
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-03-11· cited 21×
- Porter v. AshmoreFourth Circuit· 1970-02-10· cited 14×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-04-25· cited 11×
- State v. ThibodeauSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1975-09-25· cited 10×
- Porter v. AshmoreD. South Carolina· 1969-04-16· cited 7×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-09-14· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 1,370×
- State v. SwillingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-06-08· cited 35×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-05-08· cited 27×
- Morgan v. BrinkhoffSupreme Court of Colorado· 1960-12-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.