State v. Pope
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 865
Syllabus
Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied motion for leave to file motion to suppress evidence that was filed two business days before trial. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek continuance of trial date. Decision whether to request continuance is trial strategy, a continuance was implicitly requested, and court's comments indicate unwillingness to continue trial date.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 846×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- Hageman v. Bryan City School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-24· cited 20×
- State v. WynnOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-07· cited 15×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-02-01· cited 13×
- State v. CraigOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 6×
- State v. MerrittOhio Court of Appeals· 1998-03-20· cited 5×
- State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-10-09· cited 3×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.