State v. Poole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, because of way State and defendant tried case, defendant was prejudiced by answer to jury question
• “If the defendant was prejudiced by [a] constructive amendment, his failure to request a bill of particulars is irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Littlefield
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-06-16· cited 46×
• State v. O'Leary
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-07-19· cited 11×
• State v. Kelly
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-06· cited 10×
• State v. McCoy
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2006-05-24· cited 9×
• State v. Drake
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-04-06· cited 9×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-04-06· cited 8×
• State v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-04-17· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-12-17· cited 325×
• State v. Seymour
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-03-19· cited 29×
• State v. French
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-03-07· cited 16×
• State v. Dingman
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-08-03· cited 5×
• State v. Hammell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-02-08· cited 3×