State v. Pond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that double jeopardy bars reprosecution when State nol prosses original complaint after jeopardy attached
• barring subsequent retrial where State nol prossed after trial began and jeopardy had attached
• determining whether manifest necessity standard met requires weighing prosecution’s and defendant’s competing interests
• after not pros of “knowingly” indictment, grand jury “corrected] the mens rea to ‘purposely’”
• nol pros removes case from court’s consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ayer
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-09-01· cited 30×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-12-06· cited 19×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-12-05· cited 15×
• State v. Courtemarche
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-05-14· cited 6×
• State v. Solomon
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-03-20· cited 5×
• State v. Diaz
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-10-04· cited 5×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-07-24· cited 4×
• State v. Howell
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-05-15· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Jorn
  Supreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-12-09· cited 11×
• State v. Janvrin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-05-07· cited 8×
• State v. Coolidge
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1969-06-30· cited 6×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1870-01-15· cited 5×