Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/6/1991
State v. Jones
Citations
- 157 Vt. 553
- 601 A.2d 502
- 1991 Vt. LEXIS 218
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that where a party does not prosecute its case, court should “fashion a sanction appropriate to the circumstances” and “[o]nly rarely would a sanction of final termination of the case be appropriate”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- “Our continuance rule leaves control of docket management with the courts.”
- leaving control of docket management with courts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Dooley, Gibson, Johnson, Morse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ying Ji v. HeideSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-09-13· cited 27×
- In re Snowstone, LLC Act 250 Jurisdictional Opinion (Michael Harrington, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont· 2022-02-11· cited 3×
- Provident Funding Associates, L.P. v. Arnold and Peggy CampneySupreme Court of Vermont· 2017-12-22· cited 2×
- In re Snowstone, LLC Act 250 Jurisdictional Opinion (Michael Harrington, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-09-03
- State v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2017-05-01
- State v. SeagrovesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-11-19
- Ellie's Pet Care Services, LLC CU Appeal - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court· 2024-02-01
- krisroywick holding v. north east responseVermont Superior Court· 2024-06-05
- VT Woodchips Real Estate Holdings LLC CU & SP - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court· 2022-03-11
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. HawkNinth Circuit· 1979-08-07· cited 55×
- State Ex Rel. Griffin v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri· 1953-06-08· cited 48×
- Caledonian-Record Publishing Co. v. WaltonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-02· cited 46×
- State v. EricksenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-02-12· cited 32×
- State v. BennTennessee Supreme Court· 1986-07-14· cited 32×
- United States v. Andrew FureySecond Circuit· 1975-04-07· cited 30×
- State v. ForbesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-01-16· cited 30×
- State v. BradenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-09-19· cited 20×
- State v. WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-03-29· cited 20×
- State v. KahmkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-14· cited 15×
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-01-18· cited 12×
- State v. CabreraSupreme Court of Vermont· 1968-06-04· cited 11×
- State v. PondSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-12-28· cited 10×
- State v. HugoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-12· cited 6×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-06-27· cited 4×
- State v. M.J.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.