Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/12/2013
State v. Polk
Citations
- 415 S.W.3d 692
- 2013 WL 6632015
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding permissible a photographic line-up depicting six photographs generated by a computer system where the officer administering the lineup informed the witness that her attacker may or may not be pictured and that she was under no obligation to identify anyone
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amburg, Cohen, Gaertner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-01-10· cited 259×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-06-29· cited 144×
- State v. MadorieSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-03-01· cited 75×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-01-21· cited 73×
- State v. FloydMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-16· cited 40×
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-10-17· cited 37×
- State v. MentolaMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-04-23· cited 28×
- State v. LoeweMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-06-21· cited 27×
- State v. BodyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-04-17· cited 16×
- State v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-03-27· cited 10×
- State v. PetersonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-05-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.