State v. Pitts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An actual physical removal of the property from 10 the person of the victim is not required, and it is sufficient if the property be taken 11 from the presence of the victim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Talley
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-06-04· cited 85×
• State v. Alderette
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-13· cited 21×
• State v. Trujillo
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-11-17· cited 9×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Doe
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-09-06· cited 104×
• State v. Iaukea
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 83×
• State v. Iaukea
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1975-07-21· cited 80×
• State v. Turner
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-17· cited 47×
• State v. Cottone
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-10-27· cited 35×
• Tijerina v. Baker
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-01-16· cited 31×
• State v. Garcia
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-06-14· cited 29×
• Fields v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1961-09-06· cited 27×
• State v. Rhea
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-04-03· cited 24×
• State v. Garcia
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-02-23· cited 19×
• State v. Baca
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-10-08· cited 17×
• Trujillo v. Cox
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1965-05-13· cited 14×
• State v. Garcia
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-08-26· cited 11×
• State v. Lopez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 11×